Joint Care: A Modern Approach to Healing Using PRP Therapy

“

Abstract

In this educational post, I, Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST, reframe the key clinical themes from a professional discussion on orthobiologics, platelet-rich plasma, cellular therapies, patient selection, biology-driven care, standardization, and outcomes data. The central message is simple: regenerative and musculoskeletal care is a journey, not a single procedure. The field continues to evolve through collaboration, careful technique, better research methods, registry-based outcome tracking, and a deeper understanding of how blood, inflammation, biomechanics, cellular signaling, and joint biology interact.

I also explain how integrative chiropractic care fits into this model at Injury Medical Clinic PA, also known as Mission Plaza Injury Medical Clinic, in El Paso, Texas. In our multidisciplinary setting, Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD, Board Certified in Internal Medicine, NPI #1164426749, Texas MD License #J2933, serves as Medical Director and Collaborative Physician. With more than 40 years of experience as an internist, Dr. Cardenas provides medical oversight alongside my work as a chiropractor and nurse practitioner. Together, our team integrates chiropractic care, internal medicine oversight, functional medicine, personal injury care, rehabilitation, and patient-centered musculoskeletal strategies to support safer, more comprehensive care.

The Orthobiologic Journey and Why Collaboration Matters

When I reflect on the conversation surrounding orthobiologics, my first takeaway is that this field is truly a clinical journey. Whether a provider is new to regenerative musculoskeletal procedures or already experienced with platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, or other biologic approaches, the same truth applies: we get better when we work together, compare methods, study outcomes, and remain humble before the biology.

In my own clinical observations, including the principles I discuss on my professional educational platforms, such as Health Coach Clinic and my clinical profile on LinkedIn, I have seen that musculoskeletal recovery rarely depends on a single intervention. Pain, inflammation, joint dysfunction, nerve irritation, metabolic health, sleep quality, nutrition, trauma history, connective tissue integrity, and movement patterns all influence outcomes.

That is why I appreciate the major theme from the transcript: “This is a journey.” That statement captures the current state of modern orthobiologic and integrative musculoskeletal care. The science has advanced significantly, especially in platelet biology, inflammatory signaling, cellular communication, and data-driven outcomes. However, the field still requires disciplined research, standardized protocols, and careful patient selection.

Modern researchers continue to show that biologic treatments must be evaluated with rigorous methods, including:

• Prospective registries
• Randomized controlled trials
• Standardized cell and platelet counts
• Patient-reported outcome measures
• Imaging correlation
• Functional testing
• Long-term safety monitoring
• Subgroup analysis based on diagnosis and patient characteristics

For example, platelet-rich plasma has been studied for conditions such as knee osteoarthritis, tendinopathy, and other musculoskeletal disorders. Evidence suggests that PRP may improve symptoms in selected patients, particularly when preparation methods and indications are appropriate, although study heterogeneity remains a challenge (Belk et al., 2021; Bennell et al., 2021; Migliorini et al., 2023).

From my perspective, the best clinicians in this field do not simply ask, “Can we inject this?” Instead, they ask:

• Why is this tissue failing?
• What is the patient’s inflammatory state?
• Is the joint mechanically overloaded?
• Is the spine contributing to altered movement mechanics?
• Is there a metabolic driver such as insulin resistance or systemic inflammation?
• Is the patient sleeping, recovering, and eating in ways that support tissue repair?
• How will we measure whether the patient improves?

That is where integrative chiropractic care becomes essential.

Platelet-Rich Plasma and the Power of Blood-Based Healing Signals

One of the strongest take-home messages from the discussion was simple: “Get PRP going.” In clinical terms, this means that providers interested in orthobiologic care should understand the science, indications, limitations, and techniques of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

PRP is an autologous blood product, meaning it comes from the patient’s own blood. The blood is drawn and processed to concentrate platelets and, depending on the preparation method, may include varying amounts of plasma, leukocytes, and other cellular components. Platelets are best known for their role in blood clotting, but they also release biologically active proteins, including growth factors and cytokines.

These include:

• Platelet-derived growth factor
• Transforming growth factor beta
• Vascular endothelial growth factor
• Epidermal growth factor
• Insulin-like growth factor
• Fibroblast growth factor
• Interleukins and chemokines involved in immune signaling

These signaling molecules may influence tissue repair by supporting cell migration, angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and modulation of inflammation, as well as local healing responses (Marx, 2004; Everts et al., 2020).

However, PRP is not magic. It is biology. That distinction matters.

When PRP is used thoughtfully, the clinician must consider:

• What tissue is being treated
• Whether the diagnosis is appropriate
• The stage of degeneration or injury
• The platelet concentration
• Whether leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP is preferable
• The injection target
• Image guidance when appropriate
• The patient’s inflammatory and metabolic status
• The rehabilitation plan after treatment

This is where the phrase from the discussion, “It’s all about blood,” becomes clinically meaningful. Blood carries platelets, immune cells, oxygen, nutrients, inflammatory mediators, and repair signals. If a patient has uncontrolled metabolic disease, poor nutritional status, chronic systemic inflammation, or inadequate sleep, the quality of the healing environment may be compromised.

In an integrative practice, we evaluate more than the painful joint. We look at the whole person.

Biology Is King: Understanding the Joint as a Living Organ

Another powerful concept from the discussion was “Biology is king.” I agree with that statement because every musculoskeletal intervention depends on the body’s biological capacity to respond.

A joint is not simply a hinge. A joint is a living biological organ composed of:

• Articular cartilage
• Subchondral bone
• Synovium
• Ligaments
• Tendons
• Capsule
• Menisci or labral structures
• Nerves
• Blood vessels
• Immune mediators
• Fascial and muscular attachments

In osteoarthritis and post-traumatic joint injury, the entire joint environment changes. Research increasingly describes osteoarthritis not merely as “wear and tear,” but as a complex process involving low-grade inflammation, cartilage matrix degradation, subchondral bone remodeling, synovial inflammation, and altered mechanical loading (Hunter & Bierma-Zeinstra, 2019; Loeser et al., 2012).

This matters because if we treat only pain and ignore the biological and mechanical ecosystem, we may miss the reason the joint is failing.

In my clinical experience, joint pain often develops from overlapping contributors:

• Poor biomechanics
• Spinal dysfunction
• Hip or pelvic imbalance
• Foot and ankle instability
• Prior trauma
• Muscle inhibition
• Nerve irritation
• Inflammatory diet patterns
• Obesity or insulin resistance
• Reduced mitochondrial function
• Sleep disruption
• Stress physiology
• Inadequate recovery

The body adapts to these stressors until compensation fails. Then the patient experiences pain, swelling, weakness, stiffness, or loss of function.

That is why our approach emphasizes treating the whole joint and the whole kinetic chain. If a knee is painful, I also evaluate the foot, ankle, hip, pelvis, lumbar spine, gait, inflammatory status, and work or injury history. If a shoulder is painful, I consider the cervical spine, thoracic mobility, scapular control, rotator cuff integrity, breathing mechanics, and neurological input.

The central point is this: biology and biomechanics must be treated together.

Patient Selection and Precision Medicine in Regenerative Care

A key message from the discussion was patient selection, also described as specificity, precision medicine, and personalized medicine. This is one of the most important clinical points.

Not every patient is a candidate for every intervention. PRP, cellular therapies, chiropractic care, rehabilitation, nutrition, medication management, imaging, or referral for surgical evaluation must be matched to the individual.

Precision medicine means we assess the patient’s diagnosis, physiology, lifestyle, injury mechanism, medical risks, and goals before recommending a care pathway. This aligns with the broader movement in healthcare toward individualized treatment selection based on clinical features, biomarkers, imaging findings, and outcome data (Collins & Varmus, 2015).

For musculoskeletal and injury care, I consider:

• Age and biological resilience
• Diagnosis and severity
• MRI or ultrasound findings when appropriate
• Range of motion
• Strength deficits
• Neurological signs
• Inflammation level
• Medical comorbidities
• Medication use
• Prior surgeries
• Work demands
• Athletic demands
• Nutritional status
• Sleep and recovery
• Patient expectations

The reasoning is straightforward. A patient with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis and good mechanical alignment may respond differently than a patient with severe bone-on-bone degeneration, major instability, uncontrolled diabetes, and high systemic inflammation. Both patients deserve care, but they may need different strategies.

In some cases, chiropractic care and rehabilitation may be the first step. In others, diagnostic imaging, medical evaluation, laboratory testing, bracing, functional medicine support, or referral to another specialist may be appropriate.

---

Beyond Medicine: The Power of Chiropractic Care- Video

---

Integrative Chiropractic Care and Why Mechanics Must Be Restored

As a chiropractor and nurse practitioner, I view integrative chiropractic care as a bridge between mechanical correction, neuromuscular rehabilitation, and whole-person health.

Chiropractic care may include:

• Spinal and extremity assessment
• Joint mobility evaluation
• Manual therapy
• Spinal manipulation or mobilization when clinically appropriate
• Soft tissue therapy
• Postural correction
• Gait analysis
• Corrective exercise
• Neuromuscular re-education
• Functional movement restoration
• Pain neuroscience education
• Rehabilitation progression

The purpose is not simply to “adjust” a joint. The deeper goal is to improve the coordination of movement among the nervous system, joints, muscles, and connective tissues.

The spine plays a central role in motion control. Pain, stiffness, or joint restriction can alter proprioceptive input. Proprioception is the body’s ability to sense position and movement. When proprioception is impaired, the body may compensate through abnormal muscle activation, guarded movement, or poor joint loading. Over time, these compensations can contribute to recurring injury.

Research supports spinal manipulation and multimodal conservative care for selected cases of low back pain, neck pain, and some musculoskeletal conditions, especially when integrated with exercise and patient education (Colter et al., 2018; Qaseem et al., 2017).

In the context of orthobiologic or injury care, chiropractic and rehabilitation are valuable because they help address:

• Abnormal joint loading
• Reduced mobility
• Muscle inhibition
• Compensatory movement
• Pain-related guarding
• Functional weakness
• Poor posture
• Reduced tissue tolerance

If a patient receives a biologic injection but continues to move with poor mechanics, the injured tissue may remain overloaded. If the pelvis is imbalanced, the hip lacks mobility, or the ankle collapses inward during gait, the knee may continue to absorb excessive stress. Therefore, regenerative care should not stand alone. It should be combined with movement correction, rehabilitation, and lifestyle optimization.

Medical Oversight With Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD

At Injury Medical Clinic PA, also known as Mission Plaza Injury Medical Clinic, in El Paso, Texas, our multidisciplinary model integrates chiropractic, nurse practitioner-level assessment, functional medicine, rehabilitation, and medical oversight.

Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD, Board Certified in Internal Medicine, NPI #1164426749, Texas MD License #J2933, serves as Medical Director and Collaborative Physician. With more than 40 years of experience as an internist, Dr. Cardenas brings a strong foundation in internal medicine to our practice’s clinical framework.

This type of arrangement is common in integrative and injury care clinics, where an MD provides medical direction alongside chiropractic and rehabilitative services. The advantage is that patients may benefit from both musculoskeletal expertise and medical oversight.

Our team-based model supports:

• Medical review of complex cases
• Screening for red flags
• Coordination of diagnostic testing when appropriate
• Medication awareness and safety considerations
• Internal medicine perspective for chronic disease
• Collaborative care planning
• Personal injury documentation
• Functional medicine integration
• Rehabilitation coordination
• Referral when needed

This is especially important in patients with complicated histories, such as:

• Diabetes
• Hypertension
• Autoimmune disease
• Cardiovascular risk
• Medication interactions
• Post-traumatic injuries
• Neurological symptoms
• Chronic inflammation
• Metabolic syndrome
• Older age with multiple conditions

In this collaborative structure, I focus on chiropractic evaluation, functional movement, rehabilitation, injury mechanisms, and considerations in metabolic and functional medicine, as well as musculoskeletal recovery. Dr. Cardenas provides internal medicine oversight to help ensure the broader medical context is considered.

Functional Medicine and the Biology of Tissue Repair

Functional medicine is important because tissue repair depends on more than local treatment. Healing requires adequate cellular energy, immune regulation, nutrient availability, hormonal balance, vascular function, and recovery physiology.

From a functional medicine standpoint, I often think about the following biological systems:

• Inflammatory balance
• Glucose regulation
• Insulin sensitivity
• Mitochondrial function
• Gut health
• Micronutrient sufficiency
• Protein intake
• Omega-3 status
• Sleep physiology
• Stress hormone regulation
• Body composition
• Detoxification capacity
• Immune resilience

Chronic systemic inflammation can impair musculoskeletal recovery. Adipose tissue, especially visceral fat, can produce inflammatory mediators that influence pain sensitivity, cartilage metabolism, and immune behavior. Insulin resistance may also affect tissue repair through impaired vascular function, glycation of connective tissue, oxidative stress, and altered inflammatory signaling.

This is why a patient-centered plan may include:

• Anti-inflammatory nutrition
• Protein optimization
• Hydration strategies
• Micronutrient support
• Sleep restoration
• Stress reduction
• Weight management
• Blood sugar control
• Corrective exercise
• Progressive strengthening

The reason for these strategies is physiological. Connective tissue remodeling requires amino acids. Mitochondria require nutrients and oxygen to produce energy. Immune cells require balanced signaling. Collagen synthesis depends on adequate protein, vitamin C, and other cofactors. Poor sleep can increase pain sensitivity and impair recovery. These details are not secondary; they are central to healing.

Treating the Whole Joint and the Whole Person After Injury

Personal injury care requires a broad clinical lens. After an auto accident, workplace injury, fall, sports trauma, or cumulative strain event, patients may present with pain that involves multiple tissues at once.

Common injury patterns may include:

• Cervical sprain-strain
• Lumbar sprain-strain
• Disc irritation
• Facet joint pain
• Radicular symptoms
• Shoulder injury
• Hip and pelvic dysfunction
• Knee trauma
• Myofascial pain
• Headaches
• Neurological complaints
• Postural instability
• Vestibular symptoms
• Functional weakness

A purely symptom-based approach may miss the chain of injuries. For example, a rear-end collision may cause cervical acceleration-deceleration forces, thoracic guarding, shoulder tension, low back strain, and altered gait. If the patient then reduces activity due to pain, deconditioning can develop. If sleep is disrupted, pain sensitivity may increase. If inflammation remains high, recovery slows.

Our approach integrates:

• Detailed history
• Mechanism-of-injury analysis
• Orthopedic and neurological evaluation
• Functional movement testing
• Imaging referral when clinically indicated
• Chiropractic care
• Rehabilitation
• Soft tissue treatment
• Functional medicine support
• Medical oversight
• Outcome tracking
• Documentation for personal injury cases

Each technique is chosen for a reason. Manual therapy may reduce joint restriction and improve motion. Rehabilitation restores strength and motor control. Functional medicine addresses internal barriers to healing. Medical oversight helps identify systemic risks. Outcome tracking tells us whether the plan is working.

Standardization, Protocols, and Why the Future Depends on Data

Another major theme from the conversation was the need to standardize protocols and processes. I strongly agree. Orthobiologics and integrative musculoskeletal care must continue moving toward more consistent data collection and reporting.

The future of the field depends on answering practical questions:

• What preparation method was used?
• How many platelets were delivered?
• Were leukocytes included?
• Was the procedure image-guided?
• What diagnosis was treated?
• What was the severity of disease?
• What rehabilitation protocol was followed?
• What outcome measure was used?
• How long did improvement last?
• Which patients did not respond, and why?

Without standardized data, it is difficult to compare outcomes across clinics and studies. With better data, we can refine patient selection, improve safety, and identify which protocols work best for specific diagnoses.

The discussion mentioned registries and large patient datasets. This is important because real-world evidence can complement randomized trials. Registries can capture diverse patients, longer-term outcomes, and practical clinical variables that may not always appear in tightly controlled studies. However, registry data must be collected carefully to reduce bias and improve interpretation.

The strongest future model will combine:

• Randomized controlled trials
• Prospective cohort studies
• Registry data
• Laboratory characterization
• Imaging outcomes
• Patient-reported outcomes
• Functional performance testing
• Long-term safety tracking

This is how we advance from enthusiasm to evidence-based precision.

Photobiomodulation and Cellular Energy Support

The transcript also referenced photomodulation, which is more commonly referred to as photobiomodulation in the clinical literature. Photobiomodulation uses specific wavelengths of light to influence cellular function. One proposed mechanism involves the absorption of light by mitochondrial chromophores, such as cytochrome c oxidase, which may affect ATP production, oxidative stress, and inflammatory signaling (Hamblin, 2017).

In integrative musculoskeletal care, photobiomodulation may be considered as an adjunctive therapy for selected patients. It is not a replacement for diagnosis, rehabilitation, or medical decision-making. Its clinical rationale is to support tissue physiology, modulate pain, and potentially influence local healing biology.

The rationale for considering modalities such as photobiomodulation is the relationship between cellular energy and tissue repair. Cells need ATP to maintain membrane function, synthesize proteins, regulate inflammation, and remodel tissue. When injury occurs, the local environment may become hypoxic, inflamed, and metabolically stressed. Supportive modalities may be used as part of a broader plan to improve the healing environment.

The Future Is Hopeful Because the Field Is Learning

One of the most encouraging themes from the discussion was that the biological future is hopeful and positive. I share that optimism, but I believe it must be grounded in responsibility.

The future is hopeful because clinicians and researchers are increasingly focused on:

• Better patient selection
• Improved biologic characterization
• More rigorous research
• Collaborative learning
• Data registries
• Standardized protocols
• Whole-person care
• Integration of biomechanics and biology
• Patient-centered outcomes

In my clinical practice, I see hope when patients understand that healing is not passive. The patient is not simply receiving care; the patient is participating in recovery. Nutrition, sleep, movement, strength, metabolic health, and follow-through all matter.

The clinician’s responsibility is to guide, measure, adjust, and collaborate.

My Take-Home Clinical Principles

Here are the core principles I take from the discussion and apply through an integrative clinical lens:

• Orthobiologic care is a journey

• • The field is evolving, and clinicians must continue learning through collaboration and evidence.

• PRP and blood-based therapies require scientific discipline

• • Blood contains powerful healing signals, but technique, indication, and patient physiology matter.

• Biology is king

• • The body’s inflammatory, metabolic, vascular, immune, and cellular environment shapes outcomes.

• The joint is an organ.

• • Cartilage, bone, synovium, ligaments, muscles, nerves, and immune mediators work together.

• Patient selection is essential.

• • Precision medicine improves clinical reasoning and reduces inappropriate treatment.

• Treat the whole kinetic chain.

• • A painful joint must be evaluated in the context of spine, posture, gait, strength, and mechanics.

• Functional medicine supports tissue repair.

• • Nutrition, sleep, inflammation, glucose regulation, and mitochondrial function influence healing.

• Medical oversight improves safety.

• • Collaboration with internal medicine helps manage complex patients and systemic risks.

• Rehabilitation is not optional.

• • Movement retraining and strengthening help protect tissues and improve long-term outcomes.

• Data is the future

• • Registries, outcomes tracking, and standardized reporting will refine care.

Final Clinical Reflection From Dr. Jimenez

As I bring these ideas together, my message is clear: modern musculoskeletal care must be collaborative, evidence-informed, biologically grounded, and patient-specific. Orthobiologics such as PRP may have an important role in selected cases, but they work best when the patient’s entire system is considered.

At Injury Medical Clinic PA in El Paso, Texas, our model reflects that philosophy. With Dr. Maria Guadalupe Cardenas, MD, providing medical direction and collaborative internal medicine oversight, and with my role as Dr. Alexander Jimenez, DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP, ATN, CCST, we work to integrate chiropractic care, functional medicine, personal injury care, rehabilitation, and medically guided decision-making.

The future of musculoskeletal medicine is not one discipline replacing another. It is the intelligent integration of disciplines. It is the combination of biology, biomechanics, data, clinical experience, and patient-centered care.

That is how we move the field forward.

References

Belk, J. W., Kraeutler, M. J., Houck, D. A., Goodrich, J. A., Dragoo, J. L., & McCarty, E. C. (2021). Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(1), 249-260.

Bennell, K. L., Paterson, K. L., Metcalf, B. R., Duong, V., Eyles, J., Kasza, J., Wang, Y., Cicuttini, F., Buchbinder, R., Forbes, A., Harris, A., Yu, S. P., Connell, D., Linklater, J., Wang, B. H., Oo, W. M., & Hunter, D. J. (2021). Effect of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma vs placebo injection on pain and medial tibial cartilage volume in patients with knee osteoarthritis: The RESTORE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 326(20), 2021-2030.

Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793-795.

Colter, I. D., Crawford, C., Hurwitz, E. L., Vernon, H., Khorsan, R., Suttorp Booth, M., & Herman, P. M. (2018). Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Spine Journal, 18(5), 866-879.

Everts, P., Onishi, K., Jayaram, P., Lana, J. F., & Mautner, K. (2020). Platelet-rich plasma: New performance understandings and therapeutic considerations in 2020. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(20), 7794.

Hamblin, M. R. (2017). Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophysics, 4(3), 337-361.

Hunter, D. J., & Bierma-Zeinstra, S. (2019). Osteoarthritis. The Lancet, 393(10182), 1745-1759.

Loeser, R. F., Goldring, S. R., Scanzello, C. R., & Goldring, M. B. (2012). Osteoarthritis: A disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 64(6), 1697-1707.

Marx, R. E. (2004). Platelet-rich plasma: Evidence to support its use. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62(4), 489-496.

Migliorini, F., Driessen, A., Quack, V., Sippel, N., Cooper, B., Mansy, Y. E., & Eschweiler, J. (2023). Comparison between intra-articular infiltrations of placebo, steroids, hyaluronic acid, and PRP for knee osteoarthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Archives of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, 143, 1473-1490.

Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., Forciea, M. A., & Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. (2017). Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(7), 514-530.

SEO tags: orthobiologics, PRP, platelet-rich plasma, integrative chiropractic care, Dr Alexander Jimenez, Dr Maria Guadalupe Cardenas MD, Injury Medical Clinic PA, Mission Plaza Injury Medical Clinic, El Paso chiropractor, functional medicine, personal injury care, regenerative medicine, joint pain, osteoarthritis, rehabilitation, precision medicine, patient selection, medical director, internal medicine oversight, musculoskeletal recovery, photobiomodulation, chiropractic rehabilitation, evidence-based musculoskeletal care